i can't recall seeing any in SF...
urban drinking fountain
the public drinking fountain is a wonderful urban amenity (if not a vital resource in some places) which, while ubiquitous in many cities overseas, is less commonly found in american cities. as a runner, i've always mentally marked their locations and am an enthusiastic user. a wholly positive contribution to urban life, they make my life better.
would SF benefit from a comprehensive network of fountains, especially if they were self-sufficient?
any other unshared diagnoses exist out there?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
who's going to pay for them? evian? a nickel for a drink? ;-)
I don't think anyone would say that drinking fountains are bad.
What could be "networked" about fountains?
hey smarta** (j/k)
i think that would be the challenge, to see if they could be self-supporting using the resources of any particular site. i think the programmatic link is enough (urban amenity).
admittedly, it's an urban diagnosis without a systematic analysis of the UAS's.
Post a Comment